Regional - Low Growth
The tables summarise the potential outcomes of each planning measure across generalised Australian housing market geographies. They should help in giving priority to approaches that can be investigated for implementation at local or regional levels, but are not a prescription for particular jurisdictions to follow.
Each table is a guide to the potential effectiveness of the mechanisms available for the regional low growth area. Use the key to determine which mechanisms are suitable for use in the regional low growth area.
Each table heading is a link that will take you to more information about the potential effectiveness or impact of the mechanism
Land supply programs
Barrier reduction strategies
Protective mechanisms
Affordable housing planning incentives
Negotiated agreements
Mandatory requirements
|
Key |
|
High |
Mechanism is generally associated with high potential impact on affordable goals |
|
Moderate |
Mechanism may have a positive impact on affordability goals, depending on local market |
|
Low |
Mechanism may be worth further investigation, depending on local market considerations |
|
Land supply programs – Regional (low growth) |
|
Mechanism |
Considerations |
Potential Impact |
|
Development incentives and penalties –
Penalties |
To ensure development proceeds in efficient sequence |
Moderate |
|
Development incentives and penalties –
Incentives |
Land values may not support take up of incentives which increase yields
E.g. density bonuses or reduction in car parking may not be effective |
Moderate |
|
Betterment capture |
If rezoning to residential or rural residential creates significant value uplift |
Moderate |
|
Systemic land development enhancements |
If lower growth due to systemic planning problems at local or regional area |
Moderate |
|
Government land banking |
If high demand projected in future |
Low |
|
Zoning for affordable housing
(This category does not address inclusionary zoning) |
If required as a proportion of public land but not usually indicated in areas of low growth |
Low |
|
Barrier reduction strategies – Regional (low growth) |
|
Mechanism |
Considerations |
Potential Impact |
|
Planning controls – enabling, encouraging or requiring a mix of housing types |
Potentially important to ensure that new housing development meets diverse population needs |
High |
|
Covenants – eliminating exclusionary requirements on title |
In situations where master-planned estates developed on greenfields sites
|
High |
|
Building controls – removing unnecessary requirements |
Where housing diversity is constrained by unnecessarily restrictive planning controls |
Moderate |
|
Protective mechanism – Regional (low growth) |
|
Mechanism |
Considerations |
Potential Impact |
|
Impact mitigation conditions |
If caravan parks and manufactured home estates under threat of redevelopment |
High |
|
Social impact assessment requirement |
To assess impacts of major developments associated with need for employee housing |
High |
|
Controls to protect low-cost housing supply |
If existing low-cost housing is at risk and alternatives not available
|
Moderate |
|
Planning incentives – Regional (low growth) |
|
Mechanism |
Considerations |
Potential Impact |
|
Planning process incentives |
Encourages some affordable housing development if process fast and approval likely |
Moderate |
|
Graduated standards |
If graduated standards significantly reduce land or building costs |
Low |
|
Planning bonuses |
If bonus creates significant value (usually difficult in markets where land costs are relatively low) |
Low |
|
Negotiated agreements – Regional (low growth) |
|
Mechanism |
Considerations |
Potential Impact |
|
Negotiated agreement for affordable housing |
Where rezoning variation is valuable, offers leverage for negotiated affordable housing |
Moderate |
|
Mandatory requirements – Regional (low growth) |
|
Mechanism |
Considerations |
Potential Impact |
|
Mandatory contribution, (fixed amount, by threshold) |
Only in scenarios where development able to sustain significant contribution amount, may seem a deterrent to housing development in low growth, lower value contexts |
Low |
|
Mandatory contribution (negotiated amount) |
Only if site able to sustain a contribution, may seem a deterrent to housing development |
Low |
|
Onsite contribution |
Only if site able to sustain a contribution, and location is appropriate for affordable housing |
Low |
|
Offsite/cash contribution in lieu |
If site able to sustain a contribution for affordable housing
|
Low |
Top of page
Last modified: Sunday, 5 February 2012