Regional - High Growth
The tables summarise the potential outcomes of each planning measure across generalised Australian housing market geographies. They should help in giving priority to approaches that can be investigated for implementation at local or regional levels, but are not a prescription for particular jurisdictions to follow.
Each table is a guide to the potential effectiveness of the mechanisms available for the regional high growth area. Use the key to determine which mechanisms are suitable for use in the regional high growth area.
Each table heading is a link that will take you to more information about the potential effectiveness and impact of the mechanism
Land supply programs
Barrier reduction strategies
Protective mechanisms
Affordable housing planning incentives
Negotiated agreements
Mandatory requirements
|
Key |
|
High |
Mechanism is generally associated with high potential impact on affordable goals |
|
Moderate |
Mechanism may have a positive impact on affordability goals, depending on local market |
|
Low |
Mechanism may be worth further investigation, depending on local market considerations |
|
Land supply programs – Regional (high growth) |
|
Mechanism |
Considerations |
Potential Impact |
|
Systemic land development enhancements |
May ensure release strategies respond to supply |
High |
|
Government land banking |
If land secured at lower prices, to facilitate steady release in response to need |
High |
|
Development incentives and penalties –
Penalties |
To discourage speculative land holding |
High |
|
Development incentives and penalties –
Incentives |
Dependent on land values Need to consider whether certain incentives e.g. reduction car parking can be supported given service levels |
High |
|
Betterment capture |
Large scale rezoning from rural to residential = significant value uplift |
High |
|
Zoning for affordable housing
(This category does not address inclusionary zoning) |
If required as a proportion of large new release sites in private ownership or to public land |
Moderate |
|
Barrier reduction strategies – Regional (high growth) |
|
Mechanism |
Considerations |
Potential Impact |
|
Planning controls – enabling, encouraging or requiring a mix of housing types |
To achieve opportunities for diverse housing types at different price scales, within new development areas
|
High |
|
Building controls – removing unnecessary requirements |
To ensure that planning controls in new release areas do not add unnecessarily to the costs of housing production |
High |
|
Covenants – eliminating exclusionary requirements on title |
Addresses exclusionary covenants in master-planned estates in new release areas |
High |
|
Protective mechanism – Regional (high growth) |
|
Mechanism |
Considerations |
Potential Impact |
|
Impact mitigation conditions |
In areas where low-cost housing such as caravan parks and manufactured home estates subject to redevelopment pressure |
High |
|
Social impact assessment requirement |
To assess housing impacts of all major developments, such as tourism developments |
High |
|
Controls to protect low-cost housing supply |
When a specific type of housing is at risk |
High |
|
Planning incentives – Regional (high growth) |
|
Mechanism |
Considerations |
Potential Impact |
|
Graduated standards |
Affordable housing development by the private/ non-profit sector more viable |
High |
|
Planning process incentives |
Fast-track planning gives certainty and saves money
|
High |
|
Planning bonuses |
Supports lower-cost housing for private rental or home ownership |
Moderate |
|
Negotiated agreements – Regional (high growth) |
|
Mechanism |
Considerations |
Potential Impact |
|
Negotiated agreement for affordable housing |
Where rezoning/concession valuable |
High |
|
Mandatory requirements – Regional (high growth) |
|
Mechanism |
Considerations |
Potential Impact |
|
Onsite contribution |
Way to achieve access to land for affordable housing and tenure mix especially for larger, masterplanned sites or in remote locations |
High |
|
Offsite/cash contribution in lieu |
In relation to very high value sites where development capacity is limited, and there are well located alternative sites elsewhere for affordable housing |
High |
|
Mandatory contribution, (fixed amount, by threshold) |
Fixed mandatory contributions can be accommodated in land price & offset by value increase with rezoning, but needs widespread application or developers will seek opportunities not constrained |
Moderate |
|
Mandatory contribution (negotiated amount) |
Where there are limited alternative development opportunities, due to environmental or other constraints |
Moderate |
Top of page
Last modified: Sunday, 5 February 2012